HONOLULU — To build, or not to build, the most expensive per mile heavy rail line in the country. It’s a sticky question.
Three members of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco were asked during oral arguments Thursday to put a stop to the construction of the city’s planned $5.2 billion, elevated steel rail project that runs along a 20-mile corridor from West Oahu to Honolulu.
Nicholas Yost, an attorney representing eight plaintiffs in HonoluluTraffic v. FTA who are challenging the legality of the City & County of Honolulu’s selection process for rail, maintained during his 15 minutes before the judges that the city did not properly study transportation alternatives such as a Bus Rapid Transit System and managed lanes in its environmental impact statement.
Yost, who authored the National Environmental Policy Act, asked the judges to stop to the rail project and force the city to redo the official Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision.
Robert Thornton, the city’s attorney, maintained the selection of the rail was a political and policy choice, and one that would “reduce reliance on the private automobile … promote smart growth land use policies … (and) … provide an equitable alternative for low-income populations and transit-dependent communities.”
The three-judge panel — Judges Stephen Reinhardt, Andrew Hurwitz and Senior Judge Mary Schroeder — rapidly fired questions at Yost, Thornton and David Shilton, the attorney representing the Federal Transit Administration, over whether the court had jurisdiction in the case. The FTA was included in the federal lawsuit because the agency approved the city’s rail construction plans and is helping to fund it.
The hour-long hearing was held in San Francisco and broadcast live for the public and media inside Honolulu’s U.S. District Court at the request of HawaiiReporter.com.
Outside the Hawaii U.S. District Court, Ben Cayetano, Hawaii’s former governor and one of the eight plaintiffs, said their position is clear.
“The failure to consider bus rapid transit and managed lanes to me was arbitrary and capricious because nowhere in the EIS is there a reasonable explanation as to why these things weren’t considered,” he said.
In 2003, former Mayor Jeremy Harris’ administration selected BRT as the best system for the island, and the company that made the recommendation for BRT and then rail, Parsons Brinkerhoff, was the same.
Robert Thomas, a Hawaii attorney who attended oral arguments in San Franscisco, wrote on his legal blog that the appeal “had a good chance of being dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction,” because there are still outstanding issues in the Honolulu District Court.
The plaintiffs said they hope the 9th Circuit will rule in a matter of weeks because the city is planning to resume construction on the rail project as early as Sept. 16.
The project has been on hold for a year since the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled the city violated state law when it began construction without completing an Archeological Inventory Survey on the entire four segments.
For extended coverage and analysis and a video of the hearing, log onto https://www.inversecondemnation.com/
This rail fiasco has gotta go. Too much money & time wasted on an incredibly idiotic project.
So if the project's 'fate' is that it be stopped… permanently, who's gonna come up with the refund to Hawaii's taxpayers? Hawaii's taxpayers?!!
[…] on http://www.hawaiireporter.com Share this:LinkedInFacebookTwitterStumbleUponGoogle +1DiggRedditEmailLike this:Like […]
Didn't Nick Yost work on the NEPA regulations rather than the law itself? Here is another rendition of history that is probably more accurate: https://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=…
[…] in San Francisco, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will soon decide whether to halt construction on the $5 billion Honolulu rail project. A district court has already […]
Hopefully, the court will rule against the plaintiffs and for once the reactionaries who attempt to thwart the transportation needs of Honolulu (and Hawaii) will have to sit down and accept that the people can benefit. They won on Superferry, hopefully they'll lose on the rail.
HART's plan ignores the state's Environmental Council's annual report , Neil's new day plan, Hawaii Sustainability 2050, Hawaii Green Growth Initiative for the leeward side.
To view a copy of the annual go to The Annual Report or https://oeqc.doh.hawaii.gov/default.aspx
But does Kailua ExPat care? He & Kailua Resident will only change if rail moved to windward Oahu. So just ignore them.
Accept that only A FEW benefit like you, & your boss, who's also visiting his pyro daughter at her east coast college.
Caldwell uses our rail taxes to finance his business/vacation @ the same time. Go to; "Honolulu Mayor meets transportation, housing officials in DC. Mayor Caldwell left Honolulu in the evening on April 4 and returns to Honolulu on April 11.
https://khon2.com/2014/04/04/honolulu-mayor-meets-…
You did a great posting. I am thankful for your share here. I like your posting then get some idea about this post. So I will expect from you will do this type work soon.
I like the idea of Flexible Affordable Smart Transportation! However digging of new traffic underpasses beneath intersections is really a tough task and you need a good planning for this. The cost of production for this transport system is also low. twitter accounts
You are a moron. Read or research the facts on this project. It's WAY overbudget. Only 1 mile is laid down.
According to the project's October report, $1.17 billion has been spent so far on design and planning as well as actual construction of the rail line. Construction includes first 220 feet of steel rail.
IS this a low cost?
Read more @ https://www.kitv.com/news/laying-it-down-first-mil…
rt Transportation! However digging of new traffic underpasses beneath intersections is really a tough task .. seo company
Comments are closed.