Saturday, July 27, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 2024

    Big Turn Out Expected at Small Business Conference-Business Owners Want to Hear Governor’s Plan to Boost Business Climate, Economy

    0

    More than 350 people are expected to attend the Small Business Hawaii 27th Annual Conference today themed “Small Business 2003: Changing Hawaii’s Business Climate for a Better Future,” which is scheduled from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. at the Ala Moana Hotel in Honolulu.

    Calls poured into the office over the last several days of Small Business Hawaii, a non-profit member organization that lobbies and is an advocate for business in Hawaii. Sam Slom, president of Small Business Hawaii, says many member business owners and managers plan to attend the conference to hear Gov. Linda Lingle’s keynote address where she will unveil her platform to help Hawaii’s businesses and better the economy.

    Lingle, a Republican, promised in her campaign that she will do everything in her power to make Hawaii’s business climate better and to rid the state of legislation that hinders and hurts business and prevents investments from outside Hawaii. Business owners and operators say they are thrilled with the change in attitude between the Lingle administration and that of the former governor, Benjamin Cayetano, who was hostile toward businesses and passed burdensome legislation.

    Hours before Lingle gives the keynote address at the noon lunch, the conference will open at 8 a.m. with a brief address from Slom, who in addition to being president of the organization is a Republican state Senator.

    Around 8:30 a.m., Honolulu City Prosecutor Peter Carlisle will talk about crimes against business and how to prosecute them. Audience members concerned about the rise in property crime will be able to hear from and ask questions of both Carlisle and Mary Paulson, president of Security One, one of Hawaii’s most successful alarm companies. Paulson will make her speech during the “Small Business Success Stories” portion of the conference. Two other small business owners, Bill Green of Kahala Shell and Wayne Samiere of Honolulu Fish Company, also will be a part of the success stories segment and share their challenges and triumphs as small business owners in Hawaii.

    Those interested in campaign reform will hear from one of Hawaii’s most controversial figures, Bob Watada, executive director of the Campaign Spending Commission. Watada, who has fined and investigated elected officials from both major political parties and has gone up against some of the most powerful people in the state in an effort to clean up a corrupt political system, will address the conferees on “What Campaign Reforms Are Needed in 2003.”

    Following him is a panel of state Legislators who will discuss legislation they will introduce or fight in the coming year and how that will affect the business community. On the panel are Senate Majority Leader Colleen Hanabusa, D-Waianae; Senate Minority Policy Leader Bob Hogue, R-Kailua; and House Minority Leader Galen Fox, R-Waikiki.

    After the state legislators conclude their panel, hosted by KHVH Morning Talk Show Host Rick Hamada, the city council members will have their turn at laying out their plans for 2003. Topics will include taxes, budget, priorities in the city administration, the Bus Rapid Transit System, the overflowing city landfill and ethics at City Hall.

    Small Business Hawaii President and Executive Director Sam Slom says the public is welcome to attend. The cost is $40 for SBH members and their guests, $50 for non-members and for those who pay at the door.

    Slom says because of tough economic times in Hawaii and the drain this has put on the non-profit member organization, for the first time in the annual conference’s history there are corporate sponsorships for the event. Gold Sponsors include Small Business Hawaii members Ed Medeiros of Aloha Flea Market and Heavy Metal Barbell Company, Gary Arizala and HawaiiReporter.com. The Systemcenter, Inc., owned by Joyce and Bill Edwards, the winners of the Small Business Hawaii Persons of the Year in 2001, and ALTRES Inc., owned by Barron Guss, will be the Silver Sponsors. Bronze Sponsors are J.S. Services Inc. and New England Financial. Friends of Small Business Hawaii, a fourth level of sponsorship, include the Copy Shop Inc., Oils of Aloha, Charley’s Taxi, Peterson Signs-A Division of Sun Industries and The Quorum.

    For additional information, check out the SBH Web site at https://www.smallbusinesshawaii.com

    Grassroot Perspective – Jan. 8, 2003

    0

    “Dick Rowland Image”

    ”Shoots (News, Views and Quotes)”

    – The Second Amendment’s ratifiers supported the right to keep and bear arms because they believe, in essence, that gun rights support human rights. Firearm ownership, they believed, acted as individual’s insurance against despotic government. And although we are grateful for their foresight, we also owe a debt to older traditions from which they derived wise counsel.

    Similar views, for example, were reflected in the English legal
    tradition, the precursor to the American legal system. As far back as
    the rule of Alfred (871-899), the English common law presumed that an armed populace was desirable for ensuring security. So entrenched was this belief that the bearing of arms was made a citizen’s legal duty. However, as Englishmen sought greater political freedom, the monarchy came to feel threatened by an armed populace and sought to curtail private ownership of weapons. Both the Magna Carta (1215) and the English Declaration of Rights (1688) grew out of the struggle of armed Englishmen.

    This theme can be heard even in western antiquity. Cicero, for example, warned that replacing the private ownership of weapons with standing armies was contributing to the fall of the Roman Empire. Earlier still, Plato and Aristotle, despite their profound differences, shared the belief that an armed populace was essential for preventing the imposition of tyranny.

    For Human Rights Day to retain meaning, it should also embrace the
    tradition that has helped safeguard human rights — a tradition
    enshrined in the individual right protected by the Second Amendment.

    See That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right, by Stephen Halbrook (The Independent Institute)
    https://www.independent.org/tii/content/briefs/BriefTEMBA.html

    – “the countries of the Third World are poor because they do not know how to create wealth. Wealth is a pie that you produce, not a pie that you distribute. This needs to be said forcefully and clearly.”
    – Father Piro Gheddo, Translated by Fr. Robert A. Sirrio

    GRIH comment: Are you listening, Senators: Ron Menor, Roz Baker; Reps: Marilyn Lee, Dennis Arakaki, Hermina Morita, Dwight Takamine, Helene Hale?

    ”Roots (Food for Thought)”

    Education Reform

    By Lynn Harsh

    State-sponsored schooling is not a uniquely American invention.
    Historically, many countries and city-states have mandated and paid for the education of children (that is, unless they were girls or slaves). Usually, the parents of these children were called subjects, and the reason for state sponsorship was to educate citizens who would serve the interests of the state. Ancient Sparta is an excellent example.

    Our forbears endeavored to do something different in America since they believed the state existed to serve its citizens, not the other way around. The proper education of children was deemed indispensable for personal development and prosperity, which our Founders knew would translate into growth and security for our young nation.

    Early proponents of publicly run and financed education worried,
    irrationally as it turns out, that the numerous privately run education institutions would fail to provide access to children whose families were poor. They dreamed of bringing literacy to the masses and unfettered opportunity to children of low income or family standing. They envisioned an America full of citizens participating in a democratic way of life.

    A few unintended consequences have arisen from these noble ideals.

    It can be argued that our modern-day public education system is doing the opposite of what those early education activists envisioned-that it is, in fact, trapping millions of poor children in the jail of illiteracy. The deeply held desires of most educators today is
    unrealized: that children from every walk of life will not only have the opportunity to receive an excellent education, but that they will yearn to do so.

    Instead, as we demand our public schools provide equality of condition rather than equality of opportunity, American society is becoming increasingly stratified. The horrifying results are played out in living color, daily. Much of the blame for this can be laid on the doorstep of the very institution that is promising equality to every child-our massive, bureaucratically bound, public education system.

    How can such a rash statement be supported? Well, consider for a moment what creates stratification in society.

    Stratification occurs when society grades people based on their social or economic position. In the free society America’s founders envisioned, the opportunity to succeed is a citizen’s birthright, and it is an opportunity not trumped by lowly familial or economic beginnings. In practical terms, 50 years ago, the son of a poor Cuban family gained access to education and, in the year 2002, is America’s Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. That’s a one-generation move straight to the top, with corresponding wage increases.

    But in the last 50 years, many things have changed to prevent that type of one-generation move for the same Cuban immigrant, and the monolith that is public education has not kept pace with this change. How could it?

    The American economy today is starkly different. To a large degree,
    productivity used to be measured in tonnage; wealth was created from material goods; information borders came close to matching geographical borders; employees were American citizens; and people lived and worked in more stable families and communities.

    Today information is capital and it crosses borders as quickly as
    electronic transmission allows. Wealth creation depends more and more upon mental invention and imagination. The fall of communist or military dictatorships has opened up new pools of potential employees all around the world willing to work for a fraction of American-based salaries. At the same time, family structure has eroded, as have most big American cities where millions of poor children live.

    Who does this economy leave behind? Those who do not possess excellent cognitive abilities are left in the dust-and in poverty. A person who does not know the fundamentals of subject matter and who cannot reason well, solve problems and communicate effectively is at a distinct disadvantage.

    This has always been the case, but in previous economic conditions, a
    decent wage could be earned performing manual labor in numerous ways and settings. Not only do fewer of those jobs exist, but the wage
    differentials are increasing quickly between those who are mentally
    prepared and those who are not. When we force millions of children to accept a low-quality education, we doom most of them to a life of
    frustration and poverty. This stratifying process is a sure-fire formula for large-scale social conflict, and we have it.

    The Democrat Leadership Council (DLC) made the following statement in a 1999 publication:

    Today, America is a tale of two public school systems: one that could
    certainly be better, and one that is by almost any standard a disaster. The one that is failing is found in impoverished communities. Test scores are absolutely abysmal-worse than almost any other developed country. Satisfied parents are almost non-existent.

    Even in the face of widespread failure to provide meaningful educational opportunities for the most vulnerable and needy among us, the grown-ups in charge of K-12 education keep fighting each other over their respective turf. In the process, some of our country’s best assets-high-quality teachers-are frustrated beyond measure. They, too, feel like victims.

    The same DLC publication included the following quote regarding the
    battle for public education’s future:

    We struggle with two competing definitions of public education. The
    first is that public education is a commitment to specific political
    bargains, programs, job rights, and bureaucratic oversight. The second is that public education is a commitment to use any means necessary to ensure that every child learns enough to be able to participate fully as a citizen, earner and parent.

    Several particular truths underpin any legitimate education reform
    endeavor. One is that the cost and quality of education will not improve as long as the majority of students and their families must depend on a single supply source. Today, the majority of students, their families and their teachers are now beholden to a public-financed monopoly that filters every key decision about how and where children will be educated and what they will learn-even down to what they will eat or not eat for lunch.

    To be sure, the vigorous battle that must be waged to restructure the
    definition and delivery of K-12 education is about improving literacy. But the end result is a good trade-off: the exchange of angry bands of citizens roving our communities with revengeful hunger in their eyes for roving bands of literate citizens working hard to get their piece of the American Dream.

    Until we trade our preoccupation with defending a “system” and its
    bricks and mortar for defending literacy for children whenever and
    however it is delivered, our very liberty is at stake.

    ”’Lynn Harsh is Evergreen Freedom Foundation’s Executive Director and senior education analyst.”’

    The above article is quoted from the September 2002 issue of Evergreen Freedom Foundation https://www.effwa.org/nl/09_02.php#2

    ”Evergreen (Today’s Quote)”

    – “The state is and ought to be nothing whatever but community force organized, not to be an instrument of oppression and mutual plunder among citizens, but, on the contrary, to guarantee to each his own, and to cause justice and security to reign.”

    – Frederic Bastiat

    ”’See Web site”’ https://www.grassrootinstitute.org ”’for further information. Join its efforts at “Nurturing the rights and responsibilities of the individual in a civil society. …” or email or call Grassroot of Hawaii Institute President Richard O. Rowland at mailto:grassroot@hawaii.rr.com or (808) 487-4959.”’

    Big Turn Out Expected at Small Business Conference-Business Owners Want to Hear Governor's Plan to Boost Business Climate, Economy

    0

    More than 350 people are expected to attend the Small Business Hawaii 27th Annual Conference today themed “Small Business 2003: Changing Hawaii’s Business Climate for a Better Future,” which is scheduled from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. at the Ala Moana Hotel in Honolulu. Calls poured into the office over the last several days of Small Business Hawaii, a non-profit member organization that lobbies and is an advocate for business in Hawaii. Sam Slom, president of Small Business Hawaii, says many member business owners and managers plan to attend the conference to hear Gov. Linda Lingle’s keynote address where she will unveil her platform to help Hawaii’s businesses and better the economy. Lingle, a Republican, promised in her campaign that she will do everything in her power to make Hawaii’s business climate better and to rid the state of legislation that hinders and hurts business and prevents investments from outside Hawaii. Business owners and operators say they are thrilled with the change in attitude between the Lingle administration and that of the former governor, Benjamin Cayetano, who was hostile toward businesses and passed burdensome legislation. Hours before Lingle gives the keynote address at the noon lunch, the conference will open at 8 a.m. with a brief address from Slom, who in addition to being president of the organization is a Republican state Senator. Around 8:30 a.m., Honolulu City Prosecutor Peter Carlisle will talk about crimes against business and how to prosecute them. Audience members concerned about the rise in property crime will be able to hear from and ask questions of both Carlisle and Mary Paulson, president of Security One, one of Hawaii’s most successful alarm companies. Paulson will make her speech during the “Small Business Success Stories” portion of the conference. Two other small business owners, Bill Green of Kahala Shell and Wayne Samiere of Honolulu Fish Company, also will be a part of the success stories segment and share their challenges and triumphs as small business owners in Hawaii. Those interested in campaign reform will hear from one of Hawaii’s most controversial figures, Bob Watada, executive director of the Campaign Spending Commission. Watada, who has fined and investigated elected officials from both major political parties and has gone up against some of the most powerful people in the state in an effort to clean up a corrupt political system, will address the conferees on “What Campaign Reforms Are Needed in 2003.” Following him is a panel of state Legislators who will discuss legislation they will introduce or fight in the coming year and how that will affect the business community. On the panel are Senate Majority Leader Colleen Hanabusa, D-Waianae; Senate Minority Policy Leader Bob Hogue, R-Kailua; and House Minority Leader Galen Fox, R-Waikiki. After the state legislators conclude their panel, hosted by KHVH Morning Talk Show Host Rick Hamada, the city council members will have their turn at laying out their plans for 2003. Topics will include taxes, budget, priorities in the city administration, the Bus Rapid Transit System, the overflowing city landfill and ethics at City Hall. Small Business Hawaii President and Executive Director Sam Slom says the public is welcome to attend. The cost is $40 for SBH members and their guests, $50 for non-members and for those who pay at the door. Slom says because of tough economic times in Hawaii and the drain this has put on the non-profit member organization, for the first time in the annual conference’s history there are corporate sponsorships for the event. Gold Sponsors include Small Business Hawaii members Ed Medeiros of Aloha Flea Market and Heavy Metal Barbell Company, Gary Arizala and HawaiiReporter.com. The Systemcenter, Inc., owned by Joyce and Bill Edwards, the winners of the Small Business Hawaii Persons of the Year in 2001, and ALTRES Inc., owned by Barron Guss, will be the Silver Sponsors. Bronze Sponsors are J.S. Services Inc. and New England Financial. Friends of Small Business Hawaii, a fourth level of sponsorship, include the Copy Shop Inc., Oils of Aloha, Charley’s Taxi, Peterson Signs-A Division of Sun Industries and The Quorum. For additional information, check out the SBH Web site at https://www.smallbusinesshawaii.com

    Big Turn Out Expected at Small Business Conference-Business Owners Want to Hear Governor’s Plan to Boost Business Climate, Economy

    0

    More than 350 people are expected to attend the Small Business Hawaii 27th Annual Conference today themed “Small Business 2003: Changing Hawaii’s Business Climate for a Better Future,” which is scheduled from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. at the Ala Moana Hotel in Honolulu. Calls poured into the office over the last several days of Small Business Hawaii, a non-profit member organization that lobbies and is an advocate for business in Hawaii. Sam Slom, president of Small Business Hawaii, says many member business owners and managers plan to attend the conference to hear Gov. Linda Lingle’s keynote address where she will unveil her platform to help Hawaii’s businesses and better the economy. Lingle, a Republican, promised in her campaign that she will do everything in her power to make Hawaii’s business climate better and to rid the state of legislation that hinders and hurts business and prevents investments from outside Hawaii. Business owners and operators say they are thrilled with the change in attitude between the Lingle administration and that of the former governor, Benjamin Cayetano, who was hostile toward businesses and passed burdensome legislation. Hours before Lingle gives the keynote address at the noon lunch, the conference will open at 8 a.m. with a brief address from Slom, who in addition to being president of the organization is a Republican state Senator. Around 8:30 a.m., Honolulu City Prosecutor Peter Carlisle will talk about crimes against business and how to prosecute them. Audience members concerned about the rise in property crime will be able to hear from and ask questions of both Carlisle and Mary Paulson, president of Security One, one of Hawaii’s most successful alarm companies. Paulson will make her speech during the “Small Business Success Stories” portion of the conference. Two other small business owners, Bill Green of Kahala Shell and Wayne Samiere of Honolulu Fish Company, also will be a part of the success stories segment and share their challenges and triumphs as small business owners in Hawaii. Those interested in campaign reform will hear from one of Hawaii’s most controversial figures, Bob Watada, executive director of the Campaign Spending Commission. Watada, who has fined and investigated elected officials from both major political parties and has gone up against some of the most powerful people in the state in an effort to clean up a corrupt political system, will address the conferees on “What Campaign Reforms Are Needed in 2003.” Following him is a panel of state Legislators who will discuss legislation they will introduce or fight in the coming year and how that will affect the business community. On the panel are Senate Majority Leader Colleen Hanabusa, D-Waianae; Senate Minority Policy Leader Bob Hogue, R-Kailua; and House Minority Leader Galen Fox, R-Waikiki. After the state legislators conclude their panel, hosted by KHVH Morning Talk Show Host Rick Hamada, the city council members will have their turn at laying out their plans for 2003. Topics will include taxes, budget, priorities in the city administration, the Bus Rapid Transit System, the overflowing city landfill and ethics at City Hall. Small Business Hawaii President and Executive Director Sam Slom says the public is welcome to attend. The cost is $40 for SBH members and their guests, $50 for non-members and for those who pay at the door. Slom says because of tough economic times in Hawaii and the drain this has put on the non-profit member organization, for the first time in the annual conference’s history there are corporate sponsorships for the event. Gold Sponsors include Small Business Hawaii members Ed Medeiros of Aloha Flea Market and Heavy Metal Barbell Company, Gary Arizala and HawaiiReporter.com. The Systemcenter, Inc., owned by Joyce and Bill Edwards, the winners of the Small Business Hawaii Persons of the Year in 2001, and ALTRES Inc., owned by Barron Guss, will be the Silver Sponsors. Bronze Sponsors are J.S. Services Inc. and New England Financial. Friends of Small Business Hawaii, a fourth level of sponsorship, include the Copy Shop Inc., Oils of Aloha, Charley’s Taxi, Peterson Signs-A Division of Sun Industries and The Quorum. For additional information, check out the SBH Web site at https://www.smallbusinesshawaii.com

    Grassroot Perspective – Jan. 8, 2003

    0

    Dick Rowland Image ‘Shoots (News, Views and Quotes)’ – The Second Amendment’s ratifiers supported the right to keep and bear arms because they believe, in essence, that gun rights support human rights. Firearm ownership, they believed, acted as individual’s insurance against despotic government. And although we are grateful for their foresight, we also owe a debt to older traditions from which they derived wise counsel. Similar views, for example, were reflected in the English legal tradition, the precursor to the American legal system. As far back as the rule of Alfred (871-899), the English common law presumed that an armed populace was desirable for ensuring security. So entrenched was this belief that the bearing of arms was made a citizen’s legal duty. However, as Englishmen sought greater political freedom, the monarchy came to feel threatened by an armed populace and sought to curtail private ownership of weapons. Both the Magna Carta (1215) and the English Declaration of Rights (1688) grew out of the struggle of armed Englishmen. This theme can be heard even in western antiquity. Cicero, for example, warned that replacing the private ownership of weapons with standing armies was contributing to the fall of the Roman Empire. Earlier still, Plato and Aristotle, despite their profound differences, shared the belief that an armed populace was essential for preventing the imposition of tyranny. For Human Rights Day to retain meaning, it should also embrace the tradition that has helped safeguard human rights — a tradition enshrined in the individual right protected by the Second Amendment. See That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right, by Stephen Halbrook (The Independent Institute) https://www.independent.org/tii/content/briefs/BriefTEMBA.html – “the countries of the Third World are poor because they do not know how to create wealth. Wealth is a pie that you produce, not a pie that you distribute. This needs to be said forcefully and clearly.” – Father Piro Gheddo, Translated by Fr. Robert A. Sirrio GRIH comment: Are you listening, Senators: Ron Menor, Roz Baker; Reps: Marilyn Lee, Dennis Arakaki, Hermina Morita, Dwight Takamine, Helene Hale? ‘Roots (Food for Thought)’ Education Reform By Lynn Harsh State-sponsored schooling is not a uniquely American invention. Historically, many countries and city-states have mandated and paid for the education of children (that is, unless they were girls or slaves). Usually, the parents of these children were called subjects, and the reason for state sponsorship was to educate citizens who would serve the interests of the state. Ancient Sparta is an excellent example. Our forbears endeavored to do something different in America since they believed the state existed to serve its citizens, not the other way around. The proper education of children was deemed indispensable for personal development and prosperity, which our Founders knew would translate into growth and security for our young nation. Early proponents of publicly run and financed education worried, irrationally as it turns out, that the numerous privately run education institutions would fail to provide access to children whose families were poor. They dreamed of bringing literacy to the masses and unfettered opportunity to children of low income or family standing. They envisioned an America full of citizens participating in a democratic way of life. A few unintended consequences have arisen from these noble ideals. It can be argued that our modern-day public education system is doing the opposite of what those early education activists envisioned-that it is, in fact, trapping millions of poor children in the jail of illiteracy. The deeply held desires of most educators today is unrealized: that children from every walk of life will not only have the opportunity to receive an excellent education, but that they will yearn to do so. Instead, as we demand our public schools provide equality of condition rather than equality of opportunity, American society is becoming increasingly stratified. The horrifying results are played out in living color, daily. Much of the blame for this can be laid on the doorstep of the very institution that is promising equality to every child-our massive, bureaucratically bound, public education system. How can such a rash statement be supported? Well, consider for a moment what creates stratification in society. Stratification occurs when society grades people based on their social or economic position. In the free society America’s founders envisioned, the opportunity to succeed is a citizen’s birthright, and it is an opportunity not trumped by lowly familial or economic beginnings. In practical terms, 50 years ago, the son of a poor Cuban family gained access to education and, in the year 2002, is America’s Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. That’s a one-generation move straight to the top, with corresponding wage increases. But in the last 50 years, many things have changed to prevent that type of one-generation move for the same Cuban immigrant, and the monolith that is public education has not kept pace with this change. How could it? The American economy today is starkly different. To a large degree, productivity used to be measured in tonnage; wealth was created from material goods; information borders came close to matching geographical borders; employees were American citizens; and people lived and worked in more stable families and communities. Today information is capital and it crosses borders as quickly as electronic transmission allows. Wealth creation depends more and more upon mental invention and imagination. The fall of communist or military dictatorships has opened up new pools of potential employees all around the world willing to work for a fraction of American-based salaries. At the same time, family structure has eroded, as have most big American cities where millions of poor children live. Who does this economy leave behind? Those who do not possess excellent cognitive abilities are left in the dust-and in poverty. A person who does not know the fundamentals of subject matter and who cannot reason well, solve problems and communicate effectively is at a distinct disadvantage. This has always been the case, but in previous economic conditions, a decent wage could be earned performing manual labor in numerous ways and settings. Not only do fewer of those jobs exist, but the wage differentials are increasing quickly between those who are mentally prepared and those who are not. When we force millions of children to accept a low-quality education, we doom most of them to a life of frustration and poverty. This stratifying process is a sure-fire formula for large-scale social conflict, and we have it. The Democrat Leadership Council (DLC) made the following statement in a 1999 publication: Today, America is a tale of two public school systems: one that could certainly be better, and one that is by almost any standard a disaster. The one that is failing is found in impoverished communities. Test scores are absolutely abysmal-worse than almost any other developed country. Satisfied parents are almost non-existent. Even in the face of widespread failure to provide meaningful educational opportunities for the most vulnerable and needy among us, the grown-ups in charge of K-12 education keep fighting each other over their respective turf. In the process, some of our country’s best assets-high-quality teachers-are frustrated beyond measure. They, too, feel like victims. The same DLC publication included the following quote regarding the battle for public education’s future: We struggle with two competing definitions of public education. The first is that public education is a commitment to specific political bargains, programs, job rights, and bureaucratic oversight. The second is that public education is a commitment to use any means necessary to ensure that every child learns enough to be able to participate fully as a citizen, earner and parent. Several particular truths underpin any legitimate education reform endeavor. One is that the cost and quality of education will not improve as long as the majority of students and their families must depend on a single supply source. Today, the majority of students, their families and their teachers are now beholden to a public-financed monopoly that filters every key decision about how and where children will be educated and what they will learn-even down to what they will eat or not eat for lunch. To be sure, the vigorous battle that must be waged to restructure the definition and delivery of K-12 education is about improving literacy. But the end result is a good trade-off: the exchange of angry bands of citizens roving our communities with revengeful hunger in their eyes for roving bands of literate citizens working hard to get their piece of the American Dream. Until we trade our preoccupation with defending a “system” and its bricks and mortar for defending literacy for children whenever and however it is delivered, our very liberty is at stake. ”Lynn Harsh is Evergreen Freedom Foundation’s Executive Director and senior education analyst.” The above article is quoted from the September 2002 issue of Evergreen Freedom Foundation https://www.effwa.org/nl/09_02.php#2 ‘Evergreen (Today’s Quote)’ – “The state is and ought to be nothing whatever but community force organized, not to be an instrument of oppression and mutual plunder among citizens, but, on the contrary, to guarantee to each his own, and to cause justice and security to reign.” – Frederic Bastiat ”See Web site” https://www.grassrootinstitute.org ”for further information. Join its efforts at “Nurturing the rights and responsibilities of the individual in a civil society. …” or email or call Grassroot of Hawaii Institute President Richard O. Rowland at mailto:grassroot@hawaii.rr.com or (808) 487-4959.”

    From Computer Skills to Sales Confidence

    0

    “Suzanne Gelb Image”

    ”Frustration — How Can I Make Friends With My PC?”

    Q: Dear Dr. Gelb:

    I do a lot of work on my computer and sometimes things get all mixed up and the computer doesn’t behave the way I want it to, and I start clicking on this and clicking on that and it seems to just get worse. I get so angry that sometimes I just wanna throw this high-tech gadget in the ocean. Help.

    Throw It Away

    A: Dr. Gelb says . . .

    Dear Throw It Away:

    I can certainly understand the anger and frustration that you describe. However, for many people such frustration tends to be caused by the guilt they experience for being ignorant. Here’s a clue that has worked for me — many of us know very little about much of the high-tech equipment on the market nowadays, all we know is that we enjoy it when it works. In that respect, consider connecting with a reliable computer technician. Whatever it costs is likely to be well worth it. In fact, oftentimes, a knowledgeable technician may even be able to remedy the problem on the phone.

    ”Selling Myself Short — Why Do I Do That?”

    Q: Dear Dr. Gelb:

    I believe that I have a good product, but when it comes to promoting it, I feel shy and I actually question whether or not my product is as good as I think it is, so I tend to minimize its value. I think I’m missing a lot of sales because of my insecurity.

    Selling Myself Short

    A: Dr. Gelb says . . .

    Dear Selling Yourself Short:

    Many people tend to shoot themselves in the foot because of silly basic attitudes, which deny them feelings of pride and self-worth. Some of the thought patterns, which may be motivating such self-sabotage could be as follows:

    *Who do I think I am? Just a smart Aleck

    *Who told you that your service was worth anything?

    *You are just trying to build a better mousetrap, smart Aleck

    *Nobody’s going to believe you anyway, so why mention it.

    I imagine that by now you get the message. So if I were in your shoes, I’d try to reach down in my boots and find a little self-pride and self-worth and be willing to crow about my achievements. Do not be afraid to accentuate the positive aspects of your product and your service.

    ”’Suzanne J. Gelb, Ph.D., J.D. authors this daily column, Dr. Gelb Says, which answers questions about daily living and behavior issues. Dr. Gelb is a licensed psychologist in private practice in Honolulu. She holds a Ph.D. in Psychology and a Ph.D. in Human Services. Dr. Gelb is also a published author of a book on Overcoming Addictions and a book on Relationships.”’

    ”’This column is intended for entertainment use only and is not intended for the purpose of psychological diagnosis, treatment or personalized advice. For more about the column’s purpose, see”’ “An Online Intro to Dr. Gelb Says”

    ”’Email your questions to mailto:DrGelbSays@hawaiireporter.com More information on Dr. Gelb’s services and related resources available at”’ https://www.DrGelbSays.com

    From Computer Skills to Sales Confidence

    0

    Suzanne Gelb Image ‘Frustration — How Can I Make Friends With My PC?’ Q: Dear Dr. Gelb: I do a lot of work on my computer and sometimes things get all mixed up and the computer doesn’t behave the way I want it to, and I start clicking on this and clicking on that and it seems to just get worse. I get so angry that sometimes I just wanna throw this high-tech gadget in the ocean. Help. Throw It Away A: Dr. Gelb says . . . Dear Throw It Away: I can certainly understand the anger and frustration that you describe. However, for many people such frustration tends to be caused by the guilt they experience for being ignorant. Here’s a clue that has worked for me — many of us know very little about much of the high-tech equipment on the market nowadays, all we know is that we enjoy it when it works. In that respect, consider connecting with a reliable computer technician. Whatever it costs is likely to be well worth it. In fact, oftentimes, a knowledgeable technician may even be able to remedy the problem on the phone. ‘Selling Myself Short — Why Do I Do That?’ Q: Dear Dr. Gelb: I believe that I have a good product, but when it comes to promoting it, I feel shy and I actually question whether or not my product is as good as I think it is, so I tend to minimize its value. I think I’m missing a lot of sales because of my insecurity. Selling Myself Short A: Dr. Gelb says . . . Dear Selling Yourself Short: Many people tend to shoot themselves in the foot because of silly basic attitudes, which deny them feelings of pride and self-worth. Some of the thought patterns, which may be motivating such self-sabotage could be as follows: *Who do I think I am? Just a smart Aleck *Who told you that your service was worth anything? *You are just trying to build a better mousetrap, smart Aleck *Nobody’s going to believe you anyway, so why mention it. I imagine that by now you get the message. So if I were in your shoes, I’d try to reach down in my boots and find a little self-pride and self-worth and be willing to crow about my achievements. Do not be afraid to accentuate the positive aspects of your product and your service. ”Suzanne J. Gelb, Ph.D., J.D. authors this daily column, Dr. Gelb Says, which answers questions about daily living and behavior issues. Dr. Gelb is a licensed psychologist in private practice in Honolulu. She holds a Ph.D. in Psychology and a Ph.D. in Human Services. Dr. Gelb is also a published author of a book on Overcoming Addictions and a book on Relationships.” ”This column is intended for entertainment use only and is not intended for the purpose of psychological diagnosis, treatment or personalized advice. For more about the column’s purpose, see” “An Online Intro to Dr. Gelb Says” ”Email your questions to mailto:DrGelbSays@hawaiireporter.com More information on Dr. Gelb’s services and related resources available at” https://www.DrGelbSays.com

    Legislative Hearing Notices – Jan. 8, 2003

    0

    The following hearing notices, which are subject to change, were sorted and taken from the Hawaii State Capitol Web site.
    Please check that site for updates and/or changes to the schedule at
    https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/site1/docs/hearing/hearing2.asp?press1=docs&button1=current Go there and click on the Hearing Date to view the Hearing Notice.

    Hearings notices for both House and Senate measures in all committees:

    Hearing

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    1/7/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing ECD-SAT

    1/7/03 2:00 PM None Informational Briefing HED

    1/8/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN

    1/8/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing TMG

    1/8/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    1/8/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing WAM-FIN

    1/9/03 10:00 AM None Informational Briefing HMS HSH

    1/9/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing SAT-ECD

    1/9/03 2:00 PM None Informational Briefing HED

    1/10/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing HSH

    1/13/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN

    1/13/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    1/13/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing WAM FIN

    1/13/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing ECD SAT

    1/14/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing WAM

    1/14/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    1/14/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN

    1/14/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing TSM

    1/16/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN

    1/16/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    1/16/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM/FIN

    1/17/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN

    1/17/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    1/17/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM/FIN

    1/17/03 3:00 PM None Informational Briefing EDU-HED

    1/20/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN

    1/21/03 1:15 PM None Informational Briefing TSM

    1/21/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN

    1/21/03 3:00 PM None Informational Briefing WAM

    1/21/03 3:00 PM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    1/22/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN

    1/22/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    1/22/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing WAM/TMG

    1/23/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM

    1/23/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    1/23/03 1:00 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN

    1/23/03 1:15 PM None Informational Briefing TSM

    1/24/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM

    1/24/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    1/24/03 1:00 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN

    1/27/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    1/27/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM/EDU

    1/27/03 1:00 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN

    1/28/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM

    1/28/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    1/28/03 1:00 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN

    1/28/03 1:15 PM None Informational Briefing TSM

    1/29/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM

    1/29/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    1/30/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM

    1/30/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    Legislative Hearing Notices – Jan. 8, 2003

    0

    The following hearing notices, which are subject to change, were sorted and taken from the Hawaii State Capitol Web site. Please check that site for updates and/or changes to the schedule at https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/site1/docs/hearing/hearing2.asp?press1=docs&button1=current Go there and click on the Hearing Date to view the Hearing Notice. Hearings notices for both House and Senate measures in all committees: Hearing ‘Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee’ 1/7/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing ECD-SAT 1/7/03 2:00 PM None Informational Briefing HED 1/8/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN 1/8/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing TMG 1/8/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM 1/8/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing WAM-FIN 1/9/03 10:00 AM None Informational Briefing HMS HSH 1/9/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing SAT-ECD 1/9/03 2:00 PM None Informational Briefing HED 1/10/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing HSH 1/13/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN 1/13/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM 1/13/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing WAM FIN 1/13/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing ECD SAT 1/14/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing WAM 1/14/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM 1/14/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN 1/14/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing TSM 1/16/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN 1/16/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM 1/16/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM/FIN 1/17/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN 1/17/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM 1/17/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM/FIN 1/17/03 3:00 PM None Informational Briefing EDU-HED 1/20/03 9:00 AM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN 1/21/03 1:15 PM None Informational Briefing TSM 1/21/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN 1/21/03 3:00 PM None Informational Briefing WAM 1/21/03 3:00 PM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM 1/22/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN 1/22/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM 1/22/03 1:30 PM None Informational Briefing WAM/TMG 1/23/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM 1/23/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM 1/23/03 1:00 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN 1/23/03 1:15 PM None Informational Briefing TSM 1/24/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM 1/24/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM 1/24/03 1:00 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN 1/27/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM 1/27/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM/EDU 1/27/03 1:00 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN 1/28/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM 1/28/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM 1/28/03 1:00 PM None Informational Briefing Summary FIN 1/28/03 1:15 PM None Informational Briefing TSM 1/29/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM 1/29/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM 1/30/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing WAM 1/30/03 8:30 AM None Informational Briefing Summary WAM

    President Bush Taking Action to Strengthen America's Economy-Chicago, Illinois, Jan. 7, 2003

    0

    Thank you all very much. It’s a windy day out there, which is — a good day for a windy speaker. I’m honored to be your guest here at the Economic Club of Chicago. …

    For 75 years, the business leaders and the entrepreneurs in the club have helped make Chicago a prosperous and energetic city. You understand the concerns facing American workers and employers — and you believe, as I do, that we must address those concerns honestly and aggressively.

    Today in Washington, a new Congress convenes — and I will ask members of both parties to work with me to secure our economic future. We cannot be satisfied until every part of our economy is healthy and vigorous. We will not rest until every business has a chance to grow, and every person who wants to find work can find a job. So today, I’m announcing a growth and jobs plan to strengthen America’s economy — specific proposals to increase the momentum of our economic recovery.

    And this is a good city to give it in. This is one of America’s great cities. And one of the reasons why is because you have a great mayor in Richard Daley. We’re from different political parties, but we have some things in common: We both married above ourselves. It is good to see the First Lady of Chicago here. Thank you for coming. We both have famous and influential brothers. Our dads spent a little time in politics. And we love our country more than we love our political parties.

    The thing I like most about the mayor is he gets the job done for the people of Chicago. And, Mr. Mayor, I’m proud to call you friend.

    And I want to thank another proud son of Chicago, Rod Blagojevich, for being with us today, as well. He’s soon to have the second best job in America, being a governor. I congratulate him on his election. I look forward to working with him for the good of Illinois and for the good of our country. Thank you for coming, Governor-elect. I appreciate you being here.

    I flew in today with the Senator from Illinois, Peter Fitzgerald. I appreciate his leadership; I appreciate his friendship. And as we speak, the Senate is debating the Fitzgerald bill which will extend unemployment benefits to those who are looking for work in America. And, Peter, I want to thank you for your leadership on this important issue.

    And on that very same airplane was traveling with me Steve Friedman, who is the new Director of the National Economic Council. I’m honored that such a respected economic leader has agreed to join my administration. I appreciate the fact that he’s willing to take time away from a comfortable private life to serve our country. He is a strong addition to a great economic team, and I want to thank him for his willingness to serve America. Thank you for coming, Steve.

    I’ve also named two other good people to join this team. John Snow is my nominee to serve as the Secretary of Treasury. Bill Donaldson is my nominee to be the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. They will fill essential positions in my administration, and I urge the Congress to confirm them quickly.

    As the new Congress meets today, our duties to this nation are clear. We have a responsibility to meet great dangers to our country, wherever they gather. We will continue to hunt down the terrorists all across the world. Cell by cell, we are disrupting their plans. One by one, we’re showing these merciless killers the meaning of justice.

    We’re also confronting the outlaw regime in Iraq that lives by violence and deception, and is arming to threaten the civilized world. The world’s demands are clear: For the sake of peace, Saddam Hussein must disarm himself of all weapons of mass destruction, and prove that he has done so. Should he choose the other course, in the name of peace, the United States will lead a coalition of the willing to disarm the Iraqi regime of weapons of mass destruction and free the Iraqi people.

    And we’re dealing with North Korea, as well. It’s a regime that has expelled international inspectors and is attempting to defy the world through its nuclear weapons program. The United States and other nations will confront this threat, as well. In this case, I believe that by working with countries in the region, diplomacy will work. We have no aggressive intent, no argument with the North Korean people. We’re interested in peace on the Korean Peninsula.

    As we deal with the dangers of our time, different circumstances require different strategies. Yet our resolve in each case will be clear: We will not permit any regime to threaten the freedom and security of the American people, or our allies and friends around the world.

    Even as we confront these dangers, you need to know I know we have needs here at home, especially the need for a vigorous and growing economy. Too many Americans today are wondering about our economy. They’re asking, how is the economy really doing? Well, the American economy is the strongest and most resilient economy in the world. In spite of the terrible shocks that our nation has received, our economy is growing — and the entrepreneurial spirit in America is strong.

    We’ve made great progress these past two years. Remember, in the summer of 2000, during the presidential campaign, the market had started on a steady decline. Job growth started to dwindle. The economy had begun to slow. When I took office, the signs of recession were real.

    So I worked with the United States Congress to reduce income taxes for everyone who pays them — more than 100 million individuals, families, and sole proprietorships received tax relief. This tax relief was the largest in a generation, and it gave the economy a boost just at the right time, ensuring that the recession was one of the shortest and shallowest in modern American history.

    Americans should be able to count on those tax cuts as they plan their financial futures. So I will continue to press the Congress to make these tax cuts, including the end of the death tax, permanent. We know that tax cuts worked, and Americans deserve to know their tax cuts will not be taken away.

    We faced a second test with the attacks of September the 11th, 2001. These attacks caused terrible suffering, and a massive disruption of the economy. Flights were canceled. Many hotels and stores were empty. Stock trading was halted for nearly a week. So we acted — we reopened the markets; we helped the people of New York City recover; we assisted the airlines; we provided tax incentives for business investment; and we passed terrorism insurance, so building and real estate projects could go forward.

    And then our economy was tested a third time, when Americans discovered serious abuses of trust by some corporate leaders. So we passed historic reforms to assure corporate integrity, to punish wrongdoers, and defend the interests of workers and investors. Corporate greed and malfeasance cause innocent people to lose their jobs, their savings, and often their confidence in the American system. For the sake of justice, and for the sake of every honest business in America, I have made this my commitment: Corporate misdeeds will be investigated; they will be prosecuted; and they will be punished.

    We have met the tests before us because the American people have worked hard through difficult times. And now our country has entered its second year of economic growth. Our trade with other nations is expanding, bringing lower prices that come from imports, and better jobs that come from exports. More Americans are buying and building houses — a central part of the American Dream. The homeownership rate is now 68 percent, close to the highest ever. Low interest rates have allowed Americans to tap the rising value of their homes. In 2002, refinancings added more than $100 billion to American pocketbooks, money that helped renovate homes, or pay off debt, or cover tuition, or purchase other goods.

    The most important indicator of our economic strength is the growing skill and efficiency of the American worker. The productivity of American workers went up by 5.6 percent over the last four quarters for which we have data, the best increase since 1973. As productivity rises, so do wages, and our standard of living. Nationwide, incomes are rising faster than inflation.

    We have the most productive, creative and promising economic system the world has ever seen. America sets the standard for scientific research, engineering skill and medical innovation. Our companies and universities attract talent from every single continent. Investors from around the world know America is the safest place to put their money. People around the world who search for a better life still dream of working and living in the United States of America.

    All these conditions create a platform for long-term growth and prosperity. Yet, in spite of successes, we have more work to do, because too many of our citizens who want to work cannot find a job. And many employers lack the confidence to invest and create new jobs.

    We can help assure greater success tomorrow with the policies we choose today. Now, these policies must recognize that our $10-trillion economy is sustained by the labor and enterprise of the American people. Government spends a lot of money, but it doesn’t build factories, it doesn’t invest in companies, or do the work that makes the economy go. The role of government is not to manage or control the economy from Washington, D.C., but to remove obstacles standing in the way for faster economic growth. That’s our role.

    And those obstacles are clear. Many jobs are lost in America because government imposes unreasonable regulations, and many jobs are lost because the lawsuit culture of this country imposes unreasonable costs.

    I will continue to press for legal and regulatory reform. But today — today I want to talk about these concerns: Americans carry a heavy burden of taxes and debt that could slow consumer spending. I’m troubled by that. I’m also troubled by the fact that our tax system unfairly penalizes some productive investments. And I worry about people who are out of work; they need our help, both in short-term benefits and long-term opportunity. By directly confronting each of these challenges, we can preserve the hard-won gains our economy has made and advance toward greater prosperity.

    Our first challenge is to allow Americans to keep more of their money so they can spend and save and invest — the millions of individual decisions that support the market, that support business, and help create jobs.

    Consumer spending accounts for about 70 percent of our economy. It has been the driving force of our recovery. Yet there are warning signs I won’t ignore, and I hope the Congress doesn’t ignore either. Many Americans live in constant and increasing personal debt, with credit card bills so heavy they often cannot pay much more than the monthly minimum. Millions of citizens spend their entire adult lives living paycheck-to-paycheck, never getting a chance to save for their children’s education or their own retirement. Americans today are paying about a third of their income in taxes. All of this puts pressure on family budget, and therefore clouds our economic future.

    Americans facing these struggles are due to receive additional tax relief in 2004, and again in 2006. Republicans and Democrats in Congress already approved these rate reductions. And the time to deliver the tax rate reductions is now, when they can do the most good for the American businesses.

    For the sake of economic vitality, I’m asking Congress to make all the tax rate reductions effective this year. The tax cuts should be retroactive to January 1st. Upon passage I’ll order the Treasury Department to immediately adjust the amount of money withheld for income taxes, so that Americans will keep more of their paychecks right away. By speeding up the income tax cuts, we will speed economic recovery and the pace of job creation. If tax relief is good enough for Americans three years from now, it is good enough for Americans today.

    An additional beneficiary of this tax cut will be small businesses. About 30 million Americans include small business income when they file their individual tax returns with the IRS. Faster tax relief will help these businesses to expand sooner, to hire new people faster, and to build a stronger foundation for the recovery.

    We also know that middle-income families need additional relief. So today I’m asking Congress to speed up three other tax reductions promised in 2001 — tax reductions that will help our middle-income families. Instead of slowly reducing the marriage penalty until 2009, we should do it now, to help 35 million married couples. Instead of waiting until 2008 to move more taxpayers from the 15 percent bracket to the lowest bracket of 10 percent, we should make that change now and help 2 million working Americans. And instead of gradually raising the child tax credit from $600 to $1,000 per child by the year of 2010, for the benefit of 26 million families, we should raise it now.

    These tax reductions will bring real and immediate benefits to middle-income Americans. Ninety-two million Americans will keep an average of $1,083 more of their own money. A family of four with two earners and $39,000 in income will receive more than $1,100 in tax relief — real money to help pay the bills and push the economy forward. And the sooner Congress acts, the sooner the help will come.

    Taken together, these income tax cuts will put an additional $70 billion to work in the private economy over the next 18 months. And there’s no better way to help our economy grow than to leave more money in the hands of the men and women who earned it.

    Our second challenge is to encourage greater investment by individuals and small business — the kind of investing that builds personal wealth and helps company expand and creates new jobs.

    We are increasingly a nation of owners, who invest for retirement and the other financial challenges of life. One-half of American households own stock, either directly or through pension funds. And we have an obligation to make sure — now more than ever — that American investors are treated fairly.

    We can begin by treating investors fairly and equally in our tax laws. As it is now, many investments are taxed not once, but twice. First, the IRS taxes a company on its profit. Then it taxes the investors who receive the profits as dividends. The result of this double taxation is that for all the profit a company earns, shareholders who receive dividends keep as little as 40 cents on the dollar.

    Double taxation is bad for our economy. Double taxation is wrong. Double taxation falls especially hard on retired people. About half of all dividend income goes to America’s seniors, and they often rely on those checks for a steady source of income in their retirement.

    It’s fair to tax a company’s profits. It’s not fair to double-tax by taxing the shareholder on the same profits. So today, for the good of our senior citizens, and to support capital formation across the land, I’m asking the United States Congress to abolish the double taxation of dividends.

    The benefits of this tax relief will be felt throughout the economy. Abolishing double taxation of dividends will leave nearly 35 million Americans with more of their own money to spend and invest, which will promote savings and return as much as $20 billion this year to the private economy.

    By ending this investment penalty we will strengthen investor confidence. See, by ending double taxation of dividends, we will increase the return on investing, which will draw more money into the markets to provide capital to build factories, to buy equipment, hire more people.

    We must also encourage the investments that help turn small businesses into larger ones. Small businesses create the majority of new jobs in America, and they account for half the output of the economy. Currently, tax law permits small firms to write off as expenses up to $25,000 worth of equipment — like computers or machinery that they need. I’m asking the Congress to raise that limit to $75,000, and index that number for inflation. This change, together with the faster rate reductions, will benefit more than 23 million small business owners. My view is this economy can thrive only if our small businesses thrive. And we will provide them every incentive to grow and create more jobs.

    A third challenge facing our country is the need to help unemployed workers and prepare them for the new jobs of a growing economy. The unemployment rate today is 6 percent. That’s low for an economy coming out of recession; it’s higher than it should be — and the unemployment rate is projected to rise even further in the short run.

    This hardship is concentrated in certain regions and in certain industries. Manufacturing jobs have declined for 28 months in a row. You know what I’m talking about here in the Midwest. You’re showing signs of recovery here, yet many people here and across this country are still looking for work.

    A woman in Arkansas tells a typical story. She talked about the fact that her husband was laid off from his job at a local steel mill. And both she and the husband have been looking for a job for quite a while. Here’s what she said: “There’s just nothing for me to find. We’re trying to save up what little money we have and move to another community and look for jobs there.” Got to be worried about those kind of stories here in America. As we encourage long-term growth, we will not forget the men and women who are struggling today.

    Close to 70,000 workers each week exhaust their unemployment benefits — and we have an obligation to help our fellow citizens. So I’m asking this new Congress to extend unemployment benefits that expired on December the 28th. And the benefits Congress approves should be retroactive, like the Fitzgerald bill, so that people who lost their benefits last month can receive their benefits in full. Helping America’s unemployed workers should be a first order of business in the new Congress — and it looks like it’s going to be.

    We must be more creative when we help those who have the hardest time finding work. To encourage innovation and more choices, and to help those who are out of work find the dignity of a new job, today, I’m unveiling a new approach to helping unemployed Americans through Personal Re-employment Accounts. Under this new program, Americans who face the greatest difficulties in finding work will receive up to $3,000 to use in their job search. They will have great flexibility in how they use that money. A person with a Re-Employment Account will be able to decide whether to use the funds for job training, or child care, or transportation, or even to cover the costs of relocating to another city for a new job. If the job is obtained quickly — within 13 weeks — the worker will be able to keep the cash balance as a “Re-employment bonus.”

    As we see new economic growth, we will need well-trained workers to fill new jobs. So I’m going to ask the Congress to provide $3.6 billion to the states to pay for the Re-Employment accounts — enough money to help more than a million unemployed men and women across America. In order to strengthen this economy in the future, we must help these Americans today.

    The jobs and growth proposals I’ve outlined today are a focused plan to encourage consumer spending, to promote small business growth, to boost confidence in our markets, and to give critical help to unemployed citizens. Overall, this growth package will reduce the tax burden of Americans by $98 billion this year and $670 billion over the next decade. I proposed a bold plan because the need for this plan is urgent, and I urge the Congress to act swiftly and pass this bill.

    Our nation has seen two years of serious and steady challenges. The recession and the decline in the stock market slowed earnings and cut into tax revenues and created a budget deficit. And in this time of war, I can assure you this government is spending what is necessary to win the war. But the Congress must also understand this: The American people deserve and expect spending discipline in Washington, D.C. With spending discipline and with pro-growth policies, we will expand the economy and help bring down this deficit.

    This growth and jobs package is essential in the short run; it’s an immediate boost to the economy. And these proposals will help stimulate investment and put more people back to work, is what we want to have happen. They are essential for the long run, as well — to lay the groundwork for future growth and future prosperity. That growth will bring the added benefit of higher revenues for the government — revenues that will keep tax rates low, while fulfilling key obligations and protecting programs such as Medicare and Social Security.

    We’re meeting the challenges to America. We’re strengthening our economy, and we’re taking a battle to our enemies. And we’re not going to leave our work half-finished. In the months ahead, we’ll confront every threat to the safety and security of the American people. We’ll press on to turn our recovery into lasting growth and opportunity that reaches every corner of America. By the courage and by the enterprise of the American people, this great nation will prosper. And there’s no doubt in my mind this great nation we’ll prevail.

    May God bless you all, and may God bless America.

    ”’This article was reprinted from the White House Web site. See it at:”’ https://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030107-5.html