Tuesday, January 14, 2025
More
    Home Blog Page 4

    Charging Convenience Fees for Our Kids

    Back in the Dark Ages when I was going to public school here in Honolulu, I could get my school lunch for a quarter.  An extra half-pint carton of milk was a dime.  Nowadays, a school lunch costs $2.75 for most kids, and for those who qualify for low-income treatment, it costs 40 cents.

    But there is a catch, as Kirstin Downey, formerly a reporter for Civil Beat, has recently pointed out.

    In modern times, our Department of Education relies upon online accounts.  Parents can deposit money into those accounts, and the proper amount is taken out every time a kid eats lunch.  

    The catch is that when money goes into the account, the folks providing the online account pinch a little.  They call it a “convenience fee.”  The convenience fee used to be 80 cents per transaction plus 5 percent.  So, if you as a parent ponied up 25 bucks, the convenience fee would have been $2.05, and the $27.05 would pay for lunch for nine school days, roughly two weeks.  (The provider says that the convenience fee is charged by the school or school district, but we all know who keeps the money.)

    Even our DOE couldn’t stomach that, so in 2018 they selected a new provider which charged 13 cents plus 1.99% of each deposit.  That brought down the convenience fee on a $25 deposit to 63 cents, but that still adds up over the course of a school year.

    To make things worse, many providers put limits on the amount of dollars that a school lunch account can hold, $200 for example, so that multiple deposits are required each year, and so there are multiple opportunities for convenience fees to be charged.

    The problem with these convenience fees is that they are structured to hurt everyone.  If a family makes a big deposit, the percentage fee looms large.  If the deposits are small and frequent, the per-transaction flat fees bite harder.  Families of limited means might not be able to afford a big deposit simply because they are living from one paycheck to the next.  And, of course, none of the account providers pay interest on deposited funds even though most if not all of them are subsidiaries of substantial financial institutions.

    What parents might not know is that the schools are required, by federal law, to provide fee-free options.  So, if you send your kid to school with cash or a check, the school is supposed to credit your kid’s school lunch account with no convenience fee.  (I personally wouldn’t send my kid to school with a wad of cash, as I remember days when gangs of kids would accost other kids and “borrow” their lunch money but weren’t paying back the money that they took.)  And if the school says, “Sorry, we can’t accept cash or personal checks,” then the U.S. Department of Agriculture (which administers and subsidizes the school lunch program) will have something to say about that.

    USDA recently announced that it wants schools to stop charging convenience fees to low-income families and has given the schools until the 2027-28 school year to get it done.  But in 2027-28 a different President than now will hold the reins of government, and who knows whether the Trump Administration will carry out this plan.

    In the meantime, parents, know that there are options.  It may be worth it to you to pony up the extra 63 cents on a $25 deposit every couple of weeks.  If it is, fine.  If it’s not, please look into the other options.  You don’t need to have an automated service hijacking money from your keiki.

    Tips for People with Noses

    Some people smell well, and smell good. And some people are real stinkers. 

    In the typical American household, the nose is assaulted by an army of smells. You rise in the morning and go to the bathroom. If you are lucky enough not to be constipated, you have your morning bowel movement, and then spray the room with an aerosol “room freshener”, to cover the smell of what you have just done. You then brush your teeth with toothpaste filled with its fresh, minty flavor and aroma that fills your nose. 

    The shower is next, as the room fills with steamy chlorine fumes from the city water. But that doesn’t really register with your nose because you immediately start lathering up with “fresh and clean” smelling soaps. Top that off with some shampoo for your hair, which smells like strawberries, and then with conditioner, which smells like a field of fresh Irish blossoms. You exit the shower, dry off, and apply deodorant to your underarms, giving your armpits a spicy cinnamon smell. You then apply some shaving cream with its minty fresh fragrance, and either shave your face or your legs, or both. You then splash on a little aftershave, which smells great.   A little hair gel, with its ocean fresh fragrance, and you’re ready to get dressed.

    Your clothing is freshly washed using a “fresh smelling” laundry detergent, and a sweet smelling fabric softener, giving your “clean clothes” a veneer of chemicals that remind you all day long, and those around you, that you use a particular laundry detergent and fabric softener, since everyone recognizes the smell. It’s the smell of clean, you tell yourself. 

    At this point, you reek from residues of smelly chemicals that you have put on your skin since you woke up. It’s enough to overwhelm anyone’s nose, which it does. It’s called “olfactory fatigue”. Our brain dampens the signal coming from the nose when the signal doesn’t end. Since the smell is on your hair, skin and clothing, you are breathing it in constantly, and your brain just gets tired of it. So you stop realizing that you are reeking from fragrances. 

    What are fragrances? Why are they used so often in products we use daily? 

    These smells come from chemicals that volatilize (Volatile Organic Compounds, or VOCs) and enter your nose as you breathe, and they happen to stimulate your olfactory bulb deep inside your nasal sinus near your brain. When we overwhelm our sense of smell with commercial fragrances, the brain has trouble hearing above the noise, so to speak, so it dampens the smells that are around you all the time. This makes people oblivious to the fact that they are reeking from their constantly applied fragrances. 

    Are these smelly chemicals safe? Not really. The FDA does not require testing of fragrances for safety. Manufacturers do not have to tell anyone what fragrances they use, since it is proprietary. Their goal is to make a smell that people become conditioned to identify as “clean and fresh”. Of course, clothing smelling like fragrance chemicals is clearly neither clean nor fresh, but laden with chemical residue. And many fabrics adsorb the chemicals, making them impossible to get out of the clothing. (This is why I hate thrift store clothing. It smells like laundry/fabric softener, and if you wash it with other clothing it makes everything else smell like it, too.)

    Some of these chemicals could irritate the throat, nose, and lungs, which will lead to allergies, asthma, coughing, wheezing, runny eyes, runny nose, sneezing, and generally being snotty. They are also known to change heart rate and blood pressure, and cause headaches. And they act as estrogen-mimics, causing hormonal disruption. 

    When I was a kid, my mother used Tide and Bounce, so my clothing and sheets were always smelling like those products. My nose ran all the time, and I was given a freshly laundered handkerchief to blow into, which also smelled. I’d insert a tip of the handkerchief inside of my nose, trying to clean my nostril, and it would irritate my nose further from the chemicals in the handkerchief. I didn’t realize the cause, though, since my brain was oblivious to the invisible cloud of fragrance that must have encircled me for several yards. 

    There are hundreds, if not thousands, of chemicals used for each fragrance. You are exposed to probably thousands of chemicals in the various products sold with fragrance, and some are surely to affect your mind and body.  According to the Cleveland Clinic, in their article, How Fragrances Affect Health, and Ways to Reduce Exposure, over the long-term, exposure to fragrances can cause:

    1. Difficulty breathing 
    2. Changes in cardiac function, specifically in the heart’s ability to pump 
    3. Disruption to the endocrine system, which regulates hormones
    4. Increases in glucose levels, similar to those in people with type two diabetes, a risk that can be passed from pregnant women to offspring 
    5. Based on early research, possible exacerbation of dementia 
    6. Certain cancers, with high, prolonged, continuous exposure to some compounds.

    Besides physiological reactions, some fragrances will be associated in your brain with certain places or events. The brain can immediately recognize a smell, even after experiencing it once. This olfactory memory is why these products have these smells. They want consumers to mentally associate buying their product whenever they smell it. It’s Pavlovian, except with a smell instead of a bell. 

    Meanwhile, your liver needs to detoxify from these smelly chemicals once they enter the blood from the lungs. Some of the chemical also enters the blood from the skin, via the lymphatics, when the product is in contact with the skin, as with lotions, soaps, and clothing, especially intimate clothing, like bras and underwear. If the clothing is tight, the chemical will stay longer in the skin, which could result in dermatitis if you are sensitive to the chemical. 

    Of course, there is the problem of second-hand fragrance, when your fragrance has to be inhaled by someone else. If everyone used the same products, then we would all stink the same. But when someone is fragrance-free, (apart from a fart now and then), the smell of someone else’s scent can be unsettling, triggering, and even nauseating. 

    Very nice, but scented, people are frequently guilty of smelling up everyone else’s noses. Since smelling something is like eating it, since it enters your bloodstream, exposing others to a smell is a form of body invasion. You are putting chemicals into their bodies. You might as well pry open their mouths and drip perfume down their throats. 

    Which brings us to another purpose of being scented. We communicate with our smells. While we don’t use pheromones like some insects do as a mating signal, we do use perfumes as a mating signal. And the reach of the smell extends the person’s presence to where they are in your personal space, even inside your head, without prior permission. It’s a breach of personal space, slapping people in the nose and head with powerful aromas. 

    And there is no way to protect yourself from their smell, either. For example, you can’t stop the smell of perfume by farting. They don’t cancel, although that’s the basis for using bathroom spray. It just makes it worse, and more embarrassing. 

    Of course, the biggest reason why people use perfumed products is because they believe they stink. Well, the truth is that some people do. (Baking soda is an excellent armpit alternative to using deodorants to cover skunk smell with perfume.) But breathing in and absorbing chemicals all day, everyday, 24/7, even in the bedsheets and on the pillowcases, is bound to cause problems. 

    Here are some tips to help us all breathe easier.

    1. Stop using fragrance-containing products. There are lots of fragrance-free detergents and soaps. 
    2. If you have body odor, address the cause, don’t just cover it up, as they did in the Middle Ages, when they didn’t bathe.
    3. Avoid using perfume in a public setting. Nobody else wants to huff your stuff.
    4. If you experience headaches, skin irritations, and/or breathing problems such as wheezing, or feel like you have an allergy to something but you don’t know what it is, it may be what you are smelling all day and night. 
    5. When in doubt about your smell, ask someone else what you smell like. We become olfactory fatigued from our ambient aroma.
    6. Be aware that your smell is reaching out and touching the olfactory bulbs of others, and could be causing them distress, allergic response, and even psychological associations that could make them act strangely. 
    7. Boycott products that have added fragrance. They are polluting your body, your home, your children, and the environment. 

    Every nose knows the benefits of clean air, free from chemical smells. Even if you smell like hell, scents don’t make sense. So please think if you stink, and save others from having to consume your perfume. 

    Washington Monument Strategy

    In the annals of politics is the legendary strategy once used by the National Park Service to avoid crippling budget cuts.  As the story goes, when the tentative budget cuts were announced the Service told the public that, because of the looming funding issues, they would be forced to close the Washington Monument. A great public outcry followed, and the lawmakers reconsidered the cuts to the Park Service.

    To see how this strategy plays out in real life, I’ve asked the Hawaii State Tax Watch Doggie to play the part of our Department of Education (DOE).

    DOE:  Oh, woe is me!

    Observer:  What’s wrong?

    DOE:  Because of the historic tax cuts that were enacted last year, our Governorrrr…grrrr…

    Observer:  No growling!  The DOE doesn’t growl!

    DOE:  …He asked all of his departments, including us, to cut our budget by 10 percent.  Whine!  What am I going to do?

    Observer:  How about knocking off those shadowy programs that people don’t know about?

    DOE:  I’ve got it!  We currently operate 29 learning centers at middle and high schools across the state. These centers host after-school and weekend programs from theater classes to robotics, providing students with field trips and training they wouldn’t otherwise experience. We’re going to cut them all!  Eliminate all the coordinator positions and torpedo their budgets!

    Observer:  Why?  They are some of DOE’s most popular programs!

    DOE:  (Thinking) Exactly!  That’s totally the point! (Spoken) But those programs are the least aligned with the strategic objectives of our Department!

    Observer: What strategic objectives?

    DOE:  Err, um, to educate Hawaii’s keiki DURING the school day, of course! 

    Playing the clamoring voices of the public will be the Watch Doggie’s daughter (who may be our successor Watch Doggie because her dad’s getting on in years), in her Tax Foundation debut!

    THE CLAMORING PUBLIC:  Please don’t take away the learning centers!  They provide so much value to our kids and the community!

    DOE:  (With plenty of crocodile tears) It absolutely pains us to make this proposal, but it is necessary considering the amount of budget cuts we now face!

    THE CLAMORING PUBLIC:  Noooo!!!

    Observer:  But this is a $2-3 million program, and your budget is in the billions.  You sure that this program can’t be spared as opposed to some of the other shadowy programs that you have?

    DOE:  We need to maintain our overall funding levels, for the more strategically aligned programs that we have of course, and to use our resources more efficiently.  Therefore, the learning centers have to go.

    THE CLAMORING PUBLIC:  Noooo!!!

    The Board of Education: Oh goodness gracious, in light of the sentiments of the clamoring public we need to reconsider our department’s budget request!  We can certainly ask our lawmakers to find the money somewhere else.

    THE CLAMORING PUBLIC:  Hey!  Where are the treats you promised me after this acting gig was over?

    Hold on to your wallets, folks, we haven’t heard the end of this drama yet. See you at next year’s Legislature!

    Remembering Henri (aka Hank) Carbonell

    Robert Kay, a columnist for the Honolulu Star Advertiser, is currently working on a family memoir.

    Editor’s Note:

    Immigrants, as this recent presidential campaign reminds us, have not always been perceived favorably. Serving in America’s armed forces has historically been a significant pathway for immigrants to this country. 

    This Veterans Day I’d like to republish this remembrance of Henri (aka Hank) Carbonell, an Army Air Corps pilot who died when his P-39 Airacobra fighter plane crashed shortly after take off from Hato Field in Curaçao, the Dutch West Indies.  

    Hank immigrated from France prior to the Second World War with his parents. An only child, he became best friends with my father (John Kay) also an immigrant, while they attended San Francisco Junior College from 1940-1942. After my father died in 2015, I found Hank’s obituary as well as the above photo. Quite coincidentally, I found a photo of his grave in at the National Cemetery near San Francisco courtesy of findagrave.com .

    With no living relatives in this country, someone like Hank might be easily forgotten and I thought it fitting that he be honored.

    How do you dig up information about a guy who perished 81 years ago?

    I was fortunate to be in contact with Hank’s family in Catalonia (Spain) and with help from Ancestry.com which provided access to public databases on census data, voter registration, passport applications, passenger lists and the like. Footsteps Researchers of St. Louis, Missouri was very helpful in obtaining info from U.S. military archives.

    *************

    Henri Carbonell, known to his friends as Hank, was a native of the Pyrénées Orientales, a mountainous area straddling the Spanish/French frontier. Known locally as Cerdanya, his family traces its roots back to the 14th century to Llivia, a tiny Spanish enclave. Born in Saint Andre, France on December 11, 1921, Hank and his family immigrated to the U.S. in 1924. 

    Hank stands (second from the left) with fellow student-waiters. (Photo courtesy City College of San Francisco).

    After time spent in Southern California, the family eventually settled in San Francisco in 1938, where his father, Salvador, was employed as a cook, at a hospital. Hank attended Polytechnic High School in San Francisco and graduated in 1939.  

    According to a family member, the lingua franca at the Carbonell home would have mostly likely been a combination of French and Catalan. 

    Hank’s obituary in the San Francisco Chronicle. Most likely, my grandmother clipped it out from the paper and penciled in the date on the margin. (Courtesy Kay Family archive).

    After high school Hank enrolled in the Hotel & Restaurant Management Program at San Francisco Junior College. A March 11, 1940, photo illustrating a college course booklet, shows an impeccably groomed Hank in a waiter’s uniform, standing at military attention, with fellow student-waiters, behind a long table of seated hotel executives. (See photo above).

    On the 29th of December, 1942 following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Hank enlisted in the Army Air Corps.   

    Hank graduated from the Air Forces Advanced Flying School at Luke Field, near Phoenix, AZ in the Class of 42-G on July 26, 1942. In early 1943 he was assigned to the 32nd Fighter Squadron at Hato Field, Curaçao, part of the Netherlands Antilles.  

    The 32nd Fighter Squadron had the responsibility to track German U-boat “Wolfpacks” which were attacking oil tankers and refineries. Keeping the sea lanes safe was crucial for the allied war effort in North Africa which relied 100% on oil refined in the Antilles.  

    Hank’s life tragically ended on July 21, 1943. On take off from Hato Airfield the engine of his Bell P-39D Airacobra fighter (s/n 41-6862) failed. The aircraft crashed beyond the runway, in rough terrain.

    He was subsequently buried in U.S. Military Cemetery (Curaçao) which was located on the U.S. base near Hato Field.  

    A letter from Hank’s parents to my father, Lt. John Kay serving in Italy, read like a postscript: 

    Dear Lieut. Kay, 

    We want to thank you for your Easter greetings. It was very nice of you and appreciated it very much. We think a lot about you and pray hard that he protects and brings you back safe home to your parents. 

    Through one of his friends we now know that our poor boy’s accident was caused by a faulty motor. He had to land on rough country which he did but was thrown out and died shortly after without regaining consciousness well. 

    But now we know that he is buried what happened.     

    Sincerely, 

    Mr. & Mrs. S. G.  Carbonell 

    ***************

    Hank’s casket carried by Dutch Army and Navy personnel, all the way to a barge that would bring them to the ship outside the port.  (Courtesy Jos Rozenburg and National Archive of Curacao)

    According to Jos Rozenburg, a former Royal Netherlands Air Force officer who served in the Antilles, the U.S. cemetery on the island of Curaçao was carefully maintained during the war and ceremonies were held there regularly. Following hostilities, in mid-1946 The U.S. Government informed the Dutch of their intention to visit the islands and disinter the bodies to bring them back to the USA for burial in a cemetery of choice by their relatives.  

    Rozenburg stated, “Because of the very intense cooperation during the war and the warm, personal relations that resulted from it, the Dutch told the Americans that they wanted to hold a full military ceremony, closing all other activities in the capitol, Willemstad, on that day.” 

    On 6 February 1947 the American military ship USAT Round Splice arrived offshore to accept the twelve caskets. Several days before the vessel’s arrival a U.S. military delegation was flown in, led by a General and an Admiral and consisting of, among others, an Honor Guard and a military band.  

    The bodies had been disinterred before and placed in wooden caskets. The caskets, draped with the Stars and Stripes, were placed in a military chapel until it was time. Then they were ceremonially brought to the port by Dutch troops. The last mile through the center of town they were one by one hand carried by Dutch Army and Navy personnel, all the way to a barge that would bring them to the ship outside the port. 

    grave 2Rozenburg, commented, “It is unique for me as a retired military man, to see soldiers other than your own nationality, carry the bodies of fallen comrades. I think it reflects the very special bond there was (and is) between our countries that the U.S. would allow Dutch troops to carry their dead towards their final destination. And I think it was considered by the Dutch as a great honor to do so and expressed our great gratitude for their service.” 

    “So”, said Rozenburg, “this is how 1st LT USAAF Henri Carbonell left the Island of Curaçao on 6 February 1947. As senior officer his casket would have been the first of the twelve. And the entire island population came out to pay their respect as he was hand carried past them by his Dutch comrades.” 

    On April 27, 1948 First Lieutenant Hank Carbonell was buried at the Golden Gate National Cemetery.  

    Does new report offer ‘cure’ to Hawaii permitting woes?

    By Keli’i Akina

    Have you ever had trouble getting a building permit? 

    I’m guessing yes because the reaction to my recent column about a homeowner’s permitting troubles on Hawaii Island has been some of the most intense I’ve seen in my many years of sharing my thoughts with you.

    Readers responded with their stories of anger and frustration, as did attendees at last week’s events in Hilo and Honolulu presented by my colleagues and me.

    But even if you yourself haven’t faced permitting difficulties, the extreme permitting backlogs in Hawaii’s four counties could still be affecting you because these roadblocks hinder homebuilding, which fuels the ongoing housing crisis that impacts us all.

    The basis for our events in Hilo and Honolulu was to talk about Grassroot’s new policy brief, “Seven low-cost ways to speed up permitting in Hawaii,” and goodness, did I learn a lot about how Hawaii’s permitting systems make life harder for many. 

    At the Hilo luncheon, one attendee spoke about the many people living in unpermitted units in lower Puna who are afraid of losing their homes because there is no system in place to grandfather them into legality.

    There was also a story told about Hawai‘i County’s new electronic permitting system, the Electronic Processing and Inspection Center, canceling approximately 40,000 permits when it came online. Many of the people affected are now being told that they will have to tear down their homes and rebuild them according to the county’s current codes in order to get a new permit. 

    At the Honolulu event, Grassroot staff were joined by Honolulu City Council member Tyler Dos Santos-Tam and Ted Peck, president of Holu Hou Energy. Peck told a story of a business that wanted to get a solar panel and battery installed.

    According to Peck, it took two years for the business to wade through the process, partly because the county discovered that one of the stamps on the application had expired, which pushed the approval back two months and cost the business an extra $10,000. 

    I wish I could say stories like these are uncommon, but I think we all know someone who has struggled to get their permit approved, even if we haven’t been through that ordeal ourselves. 

    So how can we help get Hawaii out of this mess? The report I mentioned outlines seven ideas, including: 

    >> Allow preapproved building plans.

    >> Exempt projects that pose no major safety risks.

    >> Streamline approval for solar-related projects, which comprise a large chunk of permit applications in Hawaii.

    >> Grandfather dwellings that were built without permits.

    >> Adopt “shot clocks” whereby applicants with delayed permit approvals could receive fee reductions or even automatic acceptance.

    I am glad to say that all of these recommendations have been well-received so far. 

    Councilmember Santos-Tam agreed that exempting more projects from needing a permit and adding certainty to when permits must be issued would improve the process. 

    And just yesterday on Hawaii Island, the County Council approved a bill to increase the value of maintenance projects that don’t need a permit. If approved by the mayor, the threshold will increase $7,500 to $25,000, becoming the highest in the state.

    Advances are occurring in the other counties as well, as our team continues to collaborate with state and county leaders regarding implementation of our recommendations.

    The reforms we are promoting are small steps, yes, but there are no silver-bullet solutions to a problem as big as Hawaii’s permitting woes. 

    And we have to start somewhere if we want to see any improvement.
    _____________

    Keli‘i Akina is president and CEO of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii.

    Halloween is over but ‘the Blob’ remains as monster at Legislature

    By Keli’i Akina

    Halloween is over, but there is still a monster that threatens us.

    In years past, I have talked about the dangers of zombie and Frankenstein bills at the state Capitol. But there is another monster lurking there, quietly devouring the time and attention of all it touches. It is that large, shapeless mass of new legislation introduced every year that I shall call the Blob. 

    Richard Wiens, an editor at Honolulu Civil Beat, explained in a recent commentary that Hawaii has no meaningful limit on the number of bills legislators are allowed to introduce each session. As a result, a staggering 5,810 bills were introduced during the 2023-2024 biennium, with only 536 passing both houses and an even fewer 516 being signed into law — less than 10% of the original total.

    The onslaught of new legislation introduced every year embodies a real drain on public time and money. A majority of these bills never even get a hearing, yet legislative staffers must research and write them, process them and refer them to committees. 

    One of the worst effects of the Blob comes at the end of each session, when legislators run out of time and hurry to pass important bills before adjournment. 

    So how do we fight the Blob? Thankfully, all we need is a little bit of discipline. 

    Specifically, our representatives and senators could use the power they have to set internal rules that would limit the number of bills each member is allowed to introduce per session. At least 24 other state legislatures do this, with some limiting the number to a mere five or six bills per year. 

    According to Wiens, former House Speaker Scott Saiki made an attempt at the beginning of the 2023-2024 biennium to contain the Blob by introducing an internal limit of 20 bills per session for House members, with a higher limit for committee chairs. But that restriction also allowed waivers, and in 2023, 36 of the 51 representatives exceeded the cap.

    Hawaii’s senators, meanwhile, introduced even more bills than our representatives, despite their chamber comprising half as many members.

    New House member Kim Coco Iwamoto has suggested a limit of seven bills per representative per session. I endorse that idea, and I hope our state senators will find a way to limit themselves as well. 

    Perhaps such a limit could even discourage the use of procedural shenanigans such as “blankety-blank” bills, in which proposed spending or tax amounts are undisclosed until the end of the session — and which in the spirit of Halloween I will call “bills without a brain.”

    In any case, in the spirit of bolstering transparency and making the legislative process more productive and efficient, it’s time that we finally vanquish the Blob.
    _____________

    Keli‘i Akina is president and CEO of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii.

    Exploring Timor-Leste’s Religious Sites

    by Jonty Crane

    Despite being home to a population that is 98% Catholic—the second highest concentration in the world after the Vatican City—Timor-Leste (formerly East Timor) boasts a diverse array of sites from other religions, including Islam, Protestantism, Hinduism, and Buddhism.

    The book illustrates the variety and beauty of religious sites in Timor-Leste, including churches, mosques, temples, shrines, cemeteries, statues, Stations of the Cross, and altars.

    Through its vivid photography, Exploring Timor-Leste’s Religious Sites highlights the striking beauty of these locations while reflecting the historical ties to Portuguese colonialism that introduced Catholicism over five centuries ago, alongside traditional Timorese architecture and beliefs.

    This volume is essential for architecture enthusiasts, religious tourists, and anyone eager to explore the undiscovered in Timor-Leste.

    Exploring Timor-Leste’s Religious Sites is available as an eBook from Amazon.com.au for AUD$3.99, and all other Amazon websites globally. A look inside at the first ten pages is available under ‘read sample’.

    Exploring Timor-Leste’s Religious Sites is the second installment in the planned four-book series, Exploring Timor-Leste, aimed at showcasing this emerging travel destination. The series invites travellers to uncover the beauty, history, and potential of this little visited paradise.

    In October 2024, the first book in the series, Exploring Timor-Leste: A Comprehensive Travel Guide to One of the Least Visited Countries in the World, was published on Amazon.com.au, and is available globally as an eBook and print-on-demand.

    Upcoming is an aerial photography book of Timor-Leste, and a hiking guide. Print editions of all four books in the series are planned.

    About the author

    Jonty has visited 75 countries and has been sharing travel stories and photography for over a decade at www.JontyTravels.com. He and his partner moved from Wellington, New Zealand, to Timor-Leste in early 2024 to volunteer through Volunteer Service Abroad.

    As well as writing the Exploring Timor-Leste series, he has created www.ExploringTimor.com and posts regularly on social media about Timor-Leste at:

    He can be contacted at exploringtimorleste@gmail.com

    Asbestos exposure may still concern Hawaii veterans

    by Cristina Johnson

    The U.S. armed forces resorted to asbestos-containing products throughout the last century in preparation for WWII, when affordable materials were in high demand for mass-producing military equipment in a short time. All five military branches used products made with asbestos, resulting in many service members being exposed to asbestos, especially Second World War, Korean War, and Vietnam War veterans. The growing number of toxic exposure cases today reflects the health risks our vets assumed, in addition to the challenges of service.

    Navy veterans were at an outstandingly high risk of asbestos exposure and developing severe diseases decades after service, as the Two-Ocean Navy Act expanded the U.S. Naval Forces by more than 70% in preparation for the States’ entry into the Second World War. Shipbuilding picked up the pace by applying asbestos insulation wherever possible on naval vessels built before the 1980s.

    Courtesy MesotheliomaHelp.org

    Additionally, most of the past century’s industries used asbestos routinely, and nobody considered asbestos dust a health threat. This is why the risk of developing asbestos diseases is still a concern for all veterans who might have asbestos fibers in their lungs, including those in Hawaii’s veteran population and Honolulu’s veteran community. Toxic contaminants represent environmental and health risks on military sites, and exposure to these substances is a severe issue requiring more attention, investigation, and, in most cases, immediate action after discovery. Hawaii has eleven military bases, at least one from every branch, most of them with an essential role in WWII, among them NS Pearl Harbor Navy Base, the poster child of Hawaii’s wartime past.

    Asbestos exposure at the root of veterans’ deteriorating health

    Asbestos releases microscopic particles when disturbed, forming dust that may float in the air for hours. It’s the white dust many veterans remember. The sharp-edged microscopic threads are easy to inhale or ingest and cause irreversible damage to the tissue of organs, generating life-altering diseases.

    Asbestos-related conditions are latent for decades from the initial exposure and usually manifest symptoms when they reach advanced stages. Even if veterans may not have experienced health issues during their service, some of them now have to fight for their health, especially when they are diagnosed with illnesses like mesothelioma, asbestosis, lung cancer, or other severe respiratory diseases. Many must accept the fact that their asbestos disease will shorten their lives, as no existing treatment can reverse the damage done by asbestos. Today’s medical procedures can only slow the progression, relieve symptoms, and prevent complications.

    With Hawaii ranking 46th for asbestos-related deaths, veterans should attend periodic check-ups to monitor their health. Timely detection is crucial in asbestos diseases because it considerably improves treatment results and prolongs life expectancy.  Inhaled asbestos fibers affect the lungs first, so veterans should undergo chest X-rays or CT scans and pulmonary function (breathing) tests. These noninvasive tests reveal any injury caused by the asbestos fibers and are reliable in diagnosing benign and malignant asbestos conditions.

    Veterans who know they’ve served in an asbestos-contaminated environment or those who suspect they’ve been exposed during the military years should know their rights and options. Compensation programs and legal avenues are available through asbestos trust funds and Veterans Affairs to help those harmed by asbestos exposure, and veterans need to be informed about these resources.

    The well-known American actor, Steve McQueen, died of mesothelioma in 1980 at the age of 50. McQueen’s first exposure to asbestos likely occurred during his service in the U.S. Marine Corps from 1947 to 1950. Through his service, McQueen spent time working onboard naval ships and in the shipyards. (

    Veterans who know they’ve served in an asbestos-contaminated environment or those who suspect they’ve been exposed during the military years should know their rights and options. Compensation programs and legal avenues are available through asbestos trust funds and Veterans Affairs to help those harmed by asbestos exposure, and veterans need to be informed about these resources.

    PACT Act helps Hawaii veterans and their families

    In 2022, the 117th U.S. Congress enacted the The Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022, known as the PACT Act. The Act extends eligibility for V.A. health care for retired military members exposed to harmful
    substances during active duty and provides veterans with the care and benefits they deserve.

    Thanks to this new law, approximately 3.5 million toxic-exposed veterans will be eligible for extended V.A. benefits. Since the passage of the PACT Act, over 4 million veterans have been screened for toxic exposure, and nearly 350,000 US citizens have been approved for expanded benefits. In Hawaii, approximately 5,000 veterans have filed PACT Act claims, and over 2,000 veterans received expanded benefits. Veterans can consult more information by accessing https://www.va.gov/resources/the-pact-act-and-your-va-benefits/.

    About the author:
    Cristina Johnson is a Navy veteran advocate for Asbestos Ships Organization, a nonprofit whose primary mission is to raise awareness and educate veterans about the dangers of asbestos exposure on Navy ships and assist them in navigating the VA claims process. For
    more information, please visit our page.

    Hold That Abortion – Social Justice for Fetal People

    Our culture has awakened to the need for greater social justice for traditionally marginalized groups. The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) movement has grown out of this concern, and one of its hallmark approaches is to promote equity by advocating for special consideration for those who are systemically oppressed. Through the lens of equity, special privilege is awarded to systemically-oppressed groups to compensate for their oppression. Affirmative action is an example of equity, where you hire based on consideration of race, and not just competence. It may even sacrifice some competency for better racial diversity in the workplace. 

    Social justice proponents claim to have concerns for the equitable treatment of all disempowered social groups, with emphasis on gaining equity for the most helpless and vulnerable of society. As a result, there have been strides made to bring equity to racial, religious, ethnic, and gender groups of people who have been traditionally disempowered and oppressed. 

    Abortion is a social justice issue, and women want the right to decide what happens to their pregnant bodies. But what about social justice for the fetus? Does a fetus deserve the same social justice as women, people of color, and people with nonbinary gender identities?

    However, before we can talk about the fetus and its rights, we need to first decide if the fetus is a separate person, or just an extension of the woman. Some people think the fetus becomes a separate person at conception, while others say it happens once the heart can beat. Others say the fetus is part of the mother until delivery, and becomes a separate person once it takes its first breath. The way you define the fetus matters because if the fetus is a separate person, then they have rights. If the fetus is an extension of the woman and not a separate person, then the woman can do whatever she wants with her own body. 

    When defining the fetus, though, keep in mind that the genome of the fetus is different from that of the mother. Actually, 50% different. This contradicts the argument that the fetus is part of the woman’s body. Biologically, it is clearly a separate body, and a separate person. 

    Arguing that the fetus is not a living, separate person until a certain developmental stage is met, such as the heart breathing, is arbitrary. Clearly, every stage of development, from zygote onwards, is part of the development of an organism. The seed of a tree is still a tree. 

    The problem is that the woman is living in the world, and the fetus is living in the woman. As a result of pregnancy, a woman suddenly becomes the host of another person, and loses an aspect of her autonomy. Her pregnant body contains two people.

    This goes against our culture’s worship of the individual. We want our freedom and autonomy, and find it offensive for others to claim ownership over our bodies, whether it is to enslave us to work, or enslave a woman to pregnancy. Hence, the feminist call to arms when anti-abortionists threaten pregnant women’s autonomy. 

    The fact is that our culture is wrong, and about a lot of things. But it is especially wrong in how it considers people as individuals. The fact is that we are social creatures, not individuals. We live in separate bodies, but we are connected to one another, like bees in a hive. We are unable to reproduce without a person of the opposite sex. We depend on one another, and in a sense are connected. This is made exceeding clear when a woman gets pregnant, and becomes connected to another person. It’s just that the other person is still in their fetus stage.

    This creates a relationship between the woman and the fetus, but an unequal one. The fetus is at the mercy of the woman for food, shelter, warmth, …everything. The woman can live without her fetus, but the fetus cannot live without the woman. 

    This inequality of power is a problem for the fetus, whose sole power consists of moving within the womb and kicking. The woman holds all the cards. And that’s not fair.

    In any interpersonal transaction, those who can walk away are at a decided advantage.  Fetuses cannot walk away. They are completely at the mercy of the women who are incubating them. And if their incubation is deemed undesirable at any stage by the woman, the fetus can be subjected to eviction, which is called abortion. 

    It boils down to competing interests. The woman wants her body for herself, while the fetus wants her body for existence. If we care about equity, it’s clear that every advantage should be given to the fetus over the woman, to help balance the power equation.

    Ironically, social justice proponents support abortion rights, since they consider the inequality of women vis-a-vis men. They ignore the inequality of the woman vis-a-vis the fetus. 

    To ignore the fetus and still seem consistent with social justice principles, proponents of equity define the fetus as part of the woman. If the fetus is not a separate entity, then there is no issue about equity. 

    And here is where we see the real issue and prejudice that blinds these social justice warriors from the plight of fetuses. They want social justice for races, sexes, genders, and ethnicities, but ignore age. The social plight of disempowered retired people is not a concern of these social justice proponents. Old people only count if they have the right race, ethnicity, or gender identity. Their age is not what matters, just their other social identifiers. 

    At the other end of the age spectrum is the fetus, and they don’t care about them, either. This is why the current social justice movement is ageist. They do not consider prejudice against old people or fetuses as a social justice problem. 

    Note that humans, like other animals, go through various stages of development. Conception starts a biological event that starts a new life. Being a fetus is a stage in that life. Ignoring the rights of the fetus because it is too young is like ignoring the rights of the elderly because they are too old. And yet, both these age groups are in need of equity, to help them during their time of vulnerability, weakness, and dependence. 

    Unfortunately, ageism is difficult to fight, since old activists don’t last long. The elderly are ignored, devalued, and disempowered. Anyone who cares about social justice would see the need to assist the elderly in overcoming the ageism that makes life inequitable for them. Shouldn’t the same reasoning apply to people at the fetal end of the lifetime spectrum?

    Of course, this discussion has not addressed medical situations where a pregnancy threatens the woman. At that point, the fetus and woman have opposition interests. The woman dies if the pregnancy continues, but the fetus dies if it doesn’t. In that case, most people would side with the woman. But this is a relatively rare cause of abortion. Most appear to be about body autonomy and a woman’s right to self-determination. 

    It’s difficult to protect the rights of the unborn, since they cannot speak for themselves. I can understand why many people speak up for them. And I can understand how women might feel oppressed when told they must keep their pregnancy. 

    This discussion will not end the debate. But it will hopefully show why a culture concerned about equity for the weak and disempowered should consider the needs of the fetal person, who is truly the most vulnerable person of all. 

    The Cato Report Cards

    The Cato Institute is a nonprofit organization, based in Washington, DC, that promotes fiscal and regulatory restraint and opposes the spiraling growth of government spending.  Every two years, it puts out a Fiscal Policy Report Card on America’s Governors. 

    Before we tell you how our Hawaii fared in 2024, let’s go through some history. 

    In 2016, after David Ige defeated Neil Abercrombie on a campaign that cited Abercrombie’s tax hikes, Ige let the Abercrombie hikes expire but then enacted a few others.  General fund spending shot up, prompting Cato to give him an F

    Two years later, still under Ige’s administration, Hawaii enacted an earned income tax credit but established new, higher individual income tax rates to pay for it, namely our 9%, 10%, and 11% income tax brackets.  The GET surcharge to fund Honolulu rail got extended, and the transient accommodations tax was also raised.  Another F from Cato.

    In the 2020 report, Cato recognized that Ige signed an estate tax hike into law but also noted that he vetoed a couple of tax hikes bills.  One of the vetoed bills would have raised income taxes on real estate investment trusts, or REITs, by disallowing a key deduction allowed under federal law.  The other would have clobbered vacation rental companies such as Airbnb.  For that bit of restraint, Cato gave him his first D

    The next report card was issued in 2022, after the COVID-19 pandemic.  With Hawaii awash in federal aid money, he earned an even better grade by not simply keeping the federal money but returning some $250 million by giving residents refund checks of $300 or $100, with higher earning households pulling down a smaller amount.  That was enough to get Cato to promote Ige again, this time to a C grade

    This year, 2024, is the first report card for the Green administration.  Under his watch, the State enacted its biggest income tax cut ever.  Cato had this to say:

    The legislature followed through with HB 2404, which included even larger income tax cuts than Green had proposed.  The governor signed the bill, which doubled standard deductions and will cut taxes in future years by adjusting income tax brackets.  If the reductions proceed as planned, the average effective tax rates on middle-income earners will be cut roughly in half by 2031, with larger cuts at the bottom and smaller cuts at the top.

    This was a large tax cut, particularly in a state that rarely cuts taxes.  However, the law did not reduce Hawaii’s high top tax rate of 11 percent.  Nonetheless, taxpayers will save more than $3 billion over the first five years, which is one of the largest state tax cuts relative to total tax revenues among the states in recent years.

    Green has held the general fund budget quite flat and has been willing to trim excess spending passed by the legislature.  For these reasons, Green is the highest-scoring Democrat in this study.

    Cato gave Green a B grade this year and ranked him seventh.  The governors in the top six states (in order, Kim Reynolds of Iowa, Jim Pillen of Nebraska, Jim Justice of West Virginia, Sarah Huckabee Sanders of Arkansas, Kristi Noem of South Dakota, and Greg Gianforte of Montana) were all given A grades.  At the other end of the class curve, all receiving F’s, were all Democrats (Tony Evers of Wisconsin, John Carney of Delaware, Jay Inslee of Washington, Janet Mills of Maine, Kathy Hochul of New York, and, receiving the banana prize, Tim Walz of Minnesota).

    For further details, please take a look at the Cato Institute white papers.